Alerts Sign-up
Ongoing uncertainty regarding funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is causing concern among academic institutions across the United States, including Catholic research institutions. The NIH has announced plans to limit "indirect funds" meant for administrative costs to 15%, potentially cutting approximately $4 billion in federal funding for research at universities, cancer centers, and hospitals nationwide. This move aligns with lower rates for private grants.
The White House stated that this change aims to reduce "exorbitant" overhead without affecting "actual research." However, researchers argue that these funds are essential for maintaining necessary components such as electricity bills, security, and equipment.
Twenty-two U.S. states have filed a lawsuit to block the policy change, leading a federal judge to temporarily halt the cuts. Catholic research institutions have voiced concerns about their future endeavors due to this uncertainty.
A spokesperson from the University of Notre Dame commented on the situation: “We are actively monitoring the situation in Washington and working nonstop to document the impacts thus far.” They emphasized collaboration with partners like the Association of American Universities (AAU) and others to highlight the importance of scientific research.
Jonathan Lowery from Marian University in Indianapolis shared his perspective: “One thing you will know about researchers is that we try to minimize risk and variability as much as possible." He highlighted challenges posed by unstable funding sources: “If we are relying on a source of funds, if that suddenly becomes unstable, it can completely destroy and invalidate anything that’s been done in a project up to that point.”
Lowery expressed skepticism about replacing federal grants with private funding: “It’s very, very difficult to grow in any reliable fashion through private funding.” He also addressed perceptions about overhead costs being "exorbitant," explaining that research is inherently expensive and relies heavily on NIH support.
He further noted: “Everyone wants taxpayer dollars to be used effectively and efficiently... when we receive these funds from the NIH, they’re used for supporting true and proper overhead for the research environment.”
Lowery warned of potential consequences if grants were rescinded or frozen: “Even if the funds were frozen and then reactivated, the instability of that system is catastrophic for research productivity.”
Kate Scanlon reports on this issue for OSV News from Washington. Follow her updates on X @kgscanlon.
